Home Login Search Sitemap FAQ About Us Contact Us MIT Sloan View Cart
MIT Sloan Management Review Homepage
 
 
 

Managing Reputation

Unconventional Insights for Managing Stakeholder Trust

Michael Pirson and Deepak Malhotra
Reprint 49413; Summer 2008, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 43-50

Buy this articleBuy this article Email this page 

Initiatives to build and maintain trust with various stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers and investors, have risen to the top of the executive agenda at many organizations. But the problem is that most companies don't really understand how to manage stakeholder trust effectively. In fact, the authors' research suggests that many of the trust-building initiatives and approaches that organizations invest in may be of questionable value. Others might actually be counterproductive.

One of the reasons managing stakeholder trust is difficult is because there are many different stakeholder groups, each with its own particular needs and perspective. That is, trust is multidimensional, and it's not obvious which dimension executives need to focus on when dealing with any particular constituency. What, for example, is more important for building trust with employees and customers: a reputation for kind-hearted benevolence or for fair-minded integrity?

To answer such questions, the authors conducted a study of stakeholder trust in four different organizations. The research analyzed the relevance (if any) of various factors: benevolence, integrity, managerial competence, technical competence, transparency and value congruence. In essence, the study asked what matters — and to whom. Some of the results were unexpected, and a few were even counterintuitive, leading to the following key insights: Transparency is overrated; integrity is not enough; the right kind of competence matters; building trust with one group can destroy it with another; and value congruence matters across the board.

The new framework challenges some existing beliefs and sheds light on a number of areas that companies would be wise not to ignore. Indeed, as the authors illustrate, fundamental misunderstandings about stakeholder trust have tripped up a number of corporations, including Coca-Cola, Google, Apple, Delta Air Lines, Mattel and Sprint. In the future, a deeper knowledge of stakeholder trust will help businesses become more adept at managing stakeholder trust so that they can reap the numerous benefits, including improved cooperation with suppliers, increased motivation and productivity among employees, enhanced loyalty from customers and higher levels of support from investors.

Michael Pirson is a research fellow with the Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations at the John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University and a lecturer at the Harvard Extension School. Deepak Malhotra is an associate professor of business administration at the Harvard Business School and the coauthor of Negotiation Genius (Bantam Books, 2007). Comment on this article or contact the authors at smrfeedback@mit.edu.

  Subscribers: view the full text PDF, free.
$6.50Buy PDFBuy PDF What is this?
$12.00Buy PDFBuy PDF and permission to copy What is this?
$5.50Buy PDFBuy permission to copy from your own original What is this?
$6.50Buy PDFBuy paper reprint What is this?
$12.00Buy PDFBuy paper reprint and permission to copy What is this?

Academic pricing and volume discount information

 

[top] [back]

 
Free Issue
Join our e-mail list.
Click "GO" to register to receive alerts and updates.
POPULAR ARTICLES

MORE

privacy policy