MIT Sloan Management Review

Corporate Strategy, Management of Technology and Innovation

 

How Companies Can Avoid a Midlife Crisis

By Donald N. Sull and Dominic Houlder

October 1, 2006

Executives can avert the seemingly inevitable decline of many mature corporations by viewing their organization as a portfolio of business opportunities at various life cycle stages.

Buy article & permissions

The common perception is that companies, like people, pass through a series of life stages.1 Each firm begins with the experimentation and rapid-fire learning of a startup, passes through a frantic adolescence as it scales its business model, matures into a reliable albeit dull middle age and finally lapses into inevitable decline. Some companies progress through this sequence as cohorts — think of the Route 128 minicomputer makers or Lancashire’s cotton mills.2 Others pass through the life cycle alone, as Polaroid Corp. and fashion and home furnishing company Laura Ashley did.

For many people, maturity is a tough life stage, hence the midlife crisis. The thrills and excitement of youth have passed. Only the aches and decline of old age lie ahead. Maturity can be tough for businesses as well. The opportunities for product innovation seem few and far between, and the organization focuses on the relentless pursuit of process efficiencies, which at best stave off the inevitable decline. Daring acquisitions or groundbreaking research projects are dismissed as unseemly attempts to regain lost youth, the corporate equivalent of buying a red Corvette. (See “About the Research,” p. 28.)

Although the metaphor of a corporation going through a life cycle is a compelling analogy, it is fundamentally misleading. In short, life cycle is not destiny.3 Our research into several supposedly “mature” sectors and companies reveals a wide gap between the winners that enjoy sustained profitable growth and the losers that stumble toward frailty and decline. Consider Lloyds TSB Group PLC, a major retail financial services company in the United Kingdom. From the early 1990s through 2003, Lloyds’ CEO won plaudits for the textbook management of a mature business as tough financial controls delivered an impressive return on equity. But those results were obtained at the expense of growth, because few investment proposals could clear Lloyds’ high return bar. In contrast, rivals like the Royal... To read the complete article, login or sign-up using the form below.

 
 

More articles from the fall 2006 issue